Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 12200 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 11:37:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 11:37:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 21646 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jan 2002 11:37:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21601 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jan 2002 11:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21590 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 11:37:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3C4414A5.6090500@cortexebusiness.com.au> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 22:38:13 +1100 From: Conor MacNeill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en-au MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Helping with Ant 2 References: <200201142220.g0EMKo410673@mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3C43EAA1.8080003@cortexebusiness.com.au> <200201151044.g0FAi2811535@mail008.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Donald wrote: > > Same as always. So I see. > > None of this lets work off list stuff that you suggested - if we are going to > develope Ant2 it should be done in the *open* with standard Apache rules > applying. Your reaction at the time was "sounds good". Were you just pulling my chain? After over a year of endless, meandering discussion about Ant2, I thought something new was required to progress things. It was never intended as a fait accompli to the list but just a mechanism to progress the definition of Ant2. Anyway, I was wrong - I could not reach a consensus with you. I dropped the idea. > > None of this competing proposals and similar. > > None of this my way or not at all biz. A fair description of your position, IMHO. You don't seem too worried about using your veto to block things which are not "your way". Anyway, thanks for your input. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: