Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18693 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 09:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 09:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15378 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jan 2002 09:42:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15211 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jan 2002 09:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15192 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 09:41:57 -0000 Message-Id: <200201220941.g0M9fuE23674@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Ant2 VFS Proposal Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:45:56 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Wisdom-Cookie: . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:25, Adam Murdoch wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Vernum [mailto:Tim.Vernum@macquarie.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2002 9:37 AM > > To: 'Ant Developers List' > > Subject: RE: Ant2 VFS Proposal > > > > > > I know I'm about to open up a can of worms here... > > > > But this seems like a sure thing for commons. > > Absolutely. > > I think a good plan would be to let it mature for a while as part of the > Ant 2 work, and then move it across to commons at some point in the future > (maybe before Ant 2 is finished, maybe after). At this stage there isn't > much more to it than a few emails and a proof-of-concept or two. > > > If the VFS really Ant specific? > > Bits of it will be. Most of it will be reusable, hopefully. I'm > definitely going to use it outside Ant. Provided we let it evolve with > reusability in mind, then I don't think there's any real problem with it > living in the Ant tree for a while longer. Put it into org.apache.aut.vfs for the time being as all the aut package should be largely independent of ant. It can migrate somewhere else later. -- Cheers, Pete *--------------------------------------------------* | Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it. | | -Benjamin Franklin | *--------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: