Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 2058 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 14:34:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osaka.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.133) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2001 14:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 23561 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 14:36:44 -0000 Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org (192.18.49.131) by osaka.betaversion.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2001 14:36:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 25334 invoked by uid 97); 6 Nov 2001 14:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25318 invoked by uid 97); 6 Nov 2001 14:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25305 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2001 14:34:12 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [Ant2] Tasks as siblings of References: <200110312211.f9VMBx219284@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> <200111051314.fA5DEN215291@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 06 Nov 2001 15:34:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: Peter Donald's message of "Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:07:45 +1100" Message-ID: Lines: 37 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Strange routing or name server problems today again, haven't received any mails for hours ... I think it is not an Apache problem this time as I can see mails getting into the archives. On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Peter Donald wrote: >> >> > if( node is one of "import", "projectref" or "aspect" ) >> >> Project and Target translate into Ant's object model directly, I'm >> not sure the same is true for the things you mention. > > Well I think they do and in fact have modeled them as part of > project model in proposal. (with the exception of aspect which I am > still not decided on). I am interested to hear why you doon't > consider them part of the model. Whenever you (Peter, Jose Alberto and Conor) have been talking about "projectref", I found one reason or another to stop following the thread, so I'm not really sure we are all talking about the same thing here. Consequently I'm not sure whether the "projectref" constitutes a part of the object model or just modifies it (by adding another tree). If "import" is importing a task library, all this thing does is adding tasks (and all the other things) to the registry - I don't see that as part of the object model itself either. >> Back to tasks and types - I sense consensus building up for "allow >> everything to live outside of targets". > > hello script land! 8-) Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: