Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-20294-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 61616 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 08:23:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 08:23:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 20638 invoked by uid 97); 27 Nov 2001 08:23:07 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20622 invoked by uid 97); 27 Nov 2001 08:23:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20611 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 08:23:06 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: <available> / <condition> breaking immutability
References: <00d801c175ba$0d82b040$6401a8c0@darden.virginia.edu>
	<m3elml4omr.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<013e01c176a1$5cbb3730$c7688f80@darden.virginia.edu>
	<200111262022.fAQKMDu18573@mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au>
	<011801c176e4$a8fd7b10$6401a8c0@darden.virginia.edu>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: 27 Nov 2001 09:17:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: "Erik Hatcher"'s message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:41:22 -0500"
Message-ID: <m3snb07hm8.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Erik Hatcher <jakarta-ant@ehatchersolutions.com>
wrote:

> We should deprecate Project.unsetProperty also, right?

I added it a few weeks ago and use it from inside a testcase AFAIR.

All changes will be moot as long as we keep Project.getProperties
around - or change it to return a copy the the "real" Hashtable.

Stefan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>