Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-19684-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 76812 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 16:10:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 16:10:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 26358 invoked by uid 97); 14 Nov 2001 16:07:58 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26286 invoked by uid 97); 14 Nov 2001 16:07:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 26213 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 16:07:56 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: jlink code question
References: <86F21E9558CE6F429B2D0AEB9820F1B82EE0B6@S1001EXM01.macromedia.com>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: 14 Nov 2001 17:03:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: Brian Deitte's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:01:32 -0500"
Message-ID: <m3lmh9s5kj.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Lines: 25
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Brian Deitte <bdeitte@macromedia.com> wrote:

> IMHO, jlink isn't a bad addition,

It's not bad as such, just the way it is currently maintained (or not)
is.

> but maybe I've missed additions to zipfileset.

You sure have 8-)

> I have recieved an off-list email from the original writers and have
> found out the processEntry piece was there for OS-issues.  I'll just
> make it an optional attribute.

Do you know which OS this has been added for?

> When I submit stuff in for merging manifests, however, it should
> become a bit more unique.

Even that functionality may be easier to achieve with Conor's Manifest
class that is the foundation for <jar>'s new and improved manifest
handling.

Stefan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>