ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <dona...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] ant task with (nested) fileset(s)
Date Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:16:10 GMT
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:03, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Peter Donald <donaldp@apache.org> wrote:
> > Or are you saying that <apply /> is a better construct than
> > implementing the task properly ?
>
> Implementing which task properly?

any of them.

> <apply> saves you from writing a task in the gcc (or any similar
> transformation) case, it is a whole bunch of tasks in one - without a
> need for a custom task.

yer...

> For things like compiling C(++) sources, I'd certainly prefer a custom
> task with smart dependency checking and all that, but if my project
> contains three or four C files for my JNI stuff and the simple <apply>
> task is all I need, then why should I bother writing a task for it?

why not?

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

*------------------------------------------------------*
| Despite your efforts to be a romantic hero, you will |
| gradually evolve into a postmodern plot device.      |
*------------------------------------------------------*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message