Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25130 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2001 14:03:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25104 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2001 14:03:20 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [Ant2] Tasks as siblings of References: <20011019114930.QJFH13193.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@there> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 19 Oct 2001 16:03:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: Peter Donald's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:31:13 +1000" Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Peter Donald wrote: >> (2) Allow all tasks to be defined at the same level as (I >> don't know whether he remembers it, but Sam Ruby proposed this >> about fifteen months ago 8-). > > This has the advantage (or disadvantage) that ant files become mere > scripts and could be used for a wider variety of things. This is exactly where it is coming from, yes. >> (3) Allow all tasks that implement a given marker interface to be >> defined at the same level as s > > This is good because it flexabile and pushes all decisions to task > writer ... it is bad for all the same reasons ;) Pushing complexity into tasks instead of the core? Sounds good 8-) Stefan