ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Conor MacNeill" <>
Subject RE: Why is TaskdefsTest not in a normal ant build?
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:26:10 GMT
I would like to reorg the TaskdefsTest class anyway. I would rename it
BuildfileTest, being a test which uses a build file since there are a number
of tests, particularly datatype tests that are not taskdefs, as such. This
would clean up some package dependencies too.

> From: Stefan Bodewig []
> Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 4:04 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Why is TaskdefsTest not in a normal ant build?
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Steve Loughran <> wrote:
> > I agree that there is no need to include the actual testcases in the
> > jar, but TaskdefsTest is the base class from which testcases are
> > derived.
> One could say the same for
> and probably
> others.
> Maybe we should jar up the testcases in a separate archive - and don't
> put that into the lib directory as it should only be on the CLASSPATH
> if people explicitly ask for it.  What do you think?

+1 on making it available but keeping it separate.


View raw message