Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66606 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2001 10:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 66494 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2001 10:09:20 -0000 Message-ID: <9B3E950CB293D411ADF4009027B0A4D20201412B@maileu.imediation.com> From: Stephane Bailliez To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org, Avalon Development Cc: james-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: [vote] Intermediate directory name change to Target? Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:11:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Donald [mailto:donaldp@apache.org] [...] > Anyways a pseudo convention of using "target/" as=20 > intermediate directory has=20 > occured in commons/struts projects. Because this doesn't=20 > cause any conflicts=20 > and thus could be integrated into all apache projects=20 > (ignoring egos) I say=20 > we move towards it. The easier it is to build projects the=20 > more likely we are=20 > to see developers work with Apache. Sounds good to me even if 'target' looks strange at first, but it looks = like it can satisfy everybody. +1 --=20 St=E9phane Bailliez=20 Software Engineer, Paris - France=20 iMediation - http://www.imediation.com=20 Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and not those = from my company.=20