ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3090] Group tag under "Javadoc" core task could be improved -- system dependency
Date Sun, 19 Aug 2001 07:02:01 GMT
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3090

*** shadow/3090	Fri Aug 10 12:11:15 2001
--- shadow/3090.tmp.9328	Sun Aug 19 00:02:01 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | Group tag under "Javadoc" core task could be improved -- system dependency |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3090                        Product: Ant                     |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 1.3                     |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Enhancement              OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Core tasks              |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | Group tag under "Javadoc" core task could be improved -- system dependency |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3090                        Product: Ant                     |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 1.3                     |
! |   Resolution: FIXED                      Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Enhancement              OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Core tasks              |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 36,39 ****
  Yes there is a system-dependency in "group".  On Linux, things worked well when
  I used the colon as a separator.  Using semicolon the way javadoc for windows
  specifies and it breaks -- the packages get put under "Other Packages" as if the
! tag wasn't there.
--- 36,59 ----
  Yes there is a system-dependency in "group".  On Linux, things worked well when
  I used the colon as a separator.  Using semicolon the way javadoc for windows
  specifies and it breaks -- the packages get put under "Other Packages" as if the
! tag wasn't there.
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From conor@cortexebusiness.com.au  2001-08-19 00:02 -------
! Well, I have to say the documentation is ambiguous
! http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/tooldocs/win32/javadoc.html#group
! 
! This suggests colons are used on both Windows and Unix. While there is a 
! statement "Multiple patterns can be included in a group by separating them with 
! semicolons (;).", the heading and example both use a colon. Since Ant is not 
! currently parsing based on either colon or semi-colon and just passing such 
! strings to Javadoc, the experiences reported here suggest that the colon should 
! be used on both platforms. 
! 
! The Ant code does process group packages attribute as a comma separated list 
! but there was a bug in that code. I have fixed this for 1.4Beta2. It will 
! convert such package lists into a colon (:) separated list on all platforms. 
! 
! I have tested semi-colons on Windows and they do not work but colons do. I have 
! submitted a bug report to Sun - I'll see what they have to say.
! 
! Can you please test 1.4 Beta2 when it is available (a few hours)

Mime
View raw message