Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60613 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2001 00:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60589 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2001 00:34:40 -0000 Message-ID: <20010704003444.29432.qmail@web13403.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:34:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Diane Holt Subject: RE: PATCH: Attributes of Target can reference properties To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4E7888D4F219E145B6F81E5D3049E3BF1B10F6@scmail01.arsin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Peter Vogel wrote: > When he was told that his absence from the ant community for N months > effectively removed his rights as a voting member of the ant community, > and that he would need to "earn" the right to commit and vote, he was > rightly insulted and gave up. Hmm... I certainly don't want to get into a long debate about this, but I don't think that description reflects what I remember. As I recall it, he was told that his one -- still valid, not needing to be "earned" back -- vote wasn't some mega-vote that would count for any more than what it was: one vote. > I personally don't blame him. I don't know that I "blame him", either -- if someone feels it's time to go, that's their choice, and of course they're free to do just that. On the other hand, I have a hard time seeing his decision as amounting to much more than saying "If you aren't going to play the game that I, and I alone, want us to play, then I'm taking my ball and going home." I saw very little willingness on his part to allow for any kind of compromise, and very much in the way of wanting to be the sole voice in what direction the next-generation Ant should go. I believe he may have even said as much, claiming that the original author should have that absolute voice by right. Other people didn't see it quite that way, and I count myself among them -- if you want to keep complete control of something, then you shouldn't put it out into the open-source community, where other people will begin to invest considerable amounts of time and effort and, I believe rightfully, feel they've earned just as much of a say in its future direction as its author. Diane ===== (holtdl@yahoo.com) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/