ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Larry V. Streepy, Jr." <stre...@healthlanguage.com>
Subject Re: [Bug 1380] - I think that having conditional fails make more robust build files.
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:42:57 GMT
Ok, I must have taken stupid pills this morning because I can't figure
out what just happened with this bug.

I see that the status changed to RESOLVED, but the comments don't
indicate what happened.

Please respond to me directly (or in addition) since I don't currently
monitor ant-dev.

Thanks.

bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1380
> 
> *** shadow/1380 Thu Jun 21 07:25:54 2001
> --- shadow/1380.tmp.24500       Wed Jul  4 13:29:28 2001
> ***************
> *** 2,11 ****
>   | I think that having conditional fails make  more robust build files.       |
>   +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>   |        Bug #: 1380                        Product: Ant                     |
> ! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 1.3                     |
> ! |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
>   |     Severity: Enhancement              OS/Version: All                     |
> ! |     Priority:                           Component: Core tasks              |
>   +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>   |  Assigned To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org                                   |
>   |  Reported By: gholam@xtra.co.nz                                            |
> --- 2,11 ----
>   | I think that having conditional fails make  more robust build files.       |
>   +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>   |        Bug #: 1380                        Product: Ant                     |
> ! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 1.3                     |
> ! |   Resolution: REMIND                     Platform: All                     |
>   |     Severity: Enhancement              OS/Version: All                     |
> ! |     Priority: High                      Component: Core tasks              |
>   +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>   |  Assigned To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org                                   |
>   |  Reported By: gholam@xtra.co.nz                                            |
> ***************
> *** 36,39 ****
> 
> 
>   ------- Additional Comments From bodewig@apache.org  2001-06-21 07:25 -------
> ! *** Bug 1997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> --- 36,51 ----
> 
> 
>   ------- Additional Comments From bodewig@apache.org  2001-06-21 07:25 -------
> ! *** Bug 1997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> !
> ! ------- Additional Comments From glennm@apache.org  2001-07-04 13:29 -------
> ! The problem I'm having with this issue is that we don't allow if/unless on any
> ! other tasks.  Why should we make an exception for this one?  I agree that for
> ! the particular use case it is a useful enhancement; I'm not a huge fan of having
> ! a million targets to inform a use of what error they have in a file.  However,
> ! I'm not sure that this use case outweighs our desire to remain consistent in our
> ! use of if/unless (Please don't laugh... :-).
> !
> ! I think this one might have to wait to be reevaluated for Ant2.
> !
> ! Comments?

-- 
Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
Chief Technical Officer and VP of Engineering

Health Language, Inc.  -- "We speak the language of healthcare"

970/626-5028 (office)           mailto:streepy@healthlanguage.com
970/626-4425 (fax)              http://www.healthlanguage.com

Mime
View raw message