Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78662 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2001 06:51:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78651 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2001 06:51:36 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: modifying optional task code / References: <00b301c0ef00$6400b3e0$6401a8c0@GILAMONSTER> <004601c0ef53$45f91650$6401a8c0@GILAMONSTER> <013201c0ef98$80d4c8b0$7691070f@cv.hp.com> <03ee01c0ef9c$d9a94660$1514000a@GILAMONSTER> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 08 Jun 2001 08:51:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Erik Hatcher"'s message of "Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:57:29 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 43 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Erik Hatcher wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understand/agree with the merged task and its > dependencies being that much of a problem. The official builds at > Jakarta's site could include those jars (mail.jar and > activation.jar) just like it includes junit.jar, couldn't it? It could, but this could very soon start a religuos war 8-) - just think of the maintenance issue, the junit.jar in Ant's CVS is 3.2 while 3.7 is the current version. But lets not open yet another flame war, that's not worth it. I don't think official builds include junit.jar, we have been including JAXP, but this is a mandatory dependency for Ant. > Or is there a licensing issue such that they can't be included? Possible, I haven't checked the license on JavaMail, but if it is the same as the one on JAXP, it would be OK. > Couldn't they at least be used for the builds but perhaps not > packaged? (The