Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62655 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2001 11:29:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62505 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 11:29:09 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010605213440.00840c20@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:34:40 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: RE: [DISC] Aspect Representation was [DISC] Aspect implementation Cc: In-Reply-To: <000901c0eda8$96b029f0$da76883e@viquity.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 11:16 AM 6/5/01 +0100, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: >An orthogonal question, why is it ID an aspect but REFID is not? Shouldn't >they represent the two sides of the same coin? Who saids id should be an aspect ? ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*