Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88903 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2001 10:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88418 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 10:43:16 -0000 From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: Subject: RE: Scope of Types Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:44:40 +0100 Message-ID: <000b01c0edac$869c1e30$da76883e@viquity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>
> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > > Here you are defining an id for 'A' within a pseudo-task, so the > > blank rule about forbidding this sort of thing may not be > > correct. > > Who said I wanted to forbid what? 8-) > > Datatypes shouldn't be treated different than properties, right? If I > can define properties via param, I must have a way to define arbitrary > data types and pass them to subbuilds or projectrefs as well IMHO. > Well, the current rules would require to allow for a element. But you cannot have it because is dynamically generated. I would seem that we need something like that allows for any datatype element specification inside. Much like the operation I think Peter was talking about. This kinds of issues is what makes me think we are making some funny distinctions between and . There seem to be some missing unifying concept for both. Maybe what was called . Jose Alberto