ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Diane Holt <hol...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Need Ammo in Make vs. Ant argument...
Date Sat, 09 Jun 2001 04:49:46 GMT
--- David Jencks <davidjencks@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I've seen frequently "ant is no good for c++", and I wonder why.  I had
> no trouble writing a (linux/gcc) c++ compilation for an admittedly not
> enormous (about 80-90 files) project using apply for cpp > o and execon
> for linking. It doesn't have the extensive lists of dependencies
> sometimes found in make files, but then javac doesn't have that kind of
> dependency checking either.  So just why is make better?

How did you deal with header-file changes?

Diane


=====
(holtdl@yahoo.com)



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Mime
View raw message