Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3749 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2001 21:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3693 invoked from network); 8 May 2001 21:42:13 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010509074627.007dcc40@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 07:46:27 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: [Vote] Logging Cc: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010509072044.007e8a50@mail.alphalink.com.au> References: <20010508182649.26940.qmail@mailFA9.rediffmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 07:20 9/5/01 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >So as we need channels/categories, priorities and different Appenders / >LogTargets there is no need for a facade IMHO. On second thoughts Ant probably won't make use of Appenders/LogTargets from user tasks as it will hide this behind BuildListeners. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*