ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siberski, Wolf" <Wolf.Siber...@tui.de>
Subject RE: [Vote] Avalon-Framework integration
Date Thu, 10 May 2001 08:50:00 GMT
Peter Donald wrote:
[snip]
[Conor MacNeill wrote:]
> >My point is: You have stated that developing code for Ant would duplicate
> >Avalong but be "raw and untested", whatever raw means. The clear
implication
> >is that Avalon's code is "tested". I am trying to find out how you have
> >tested. Where is this code deployed that it has received significant
> >testing. You are making assertions and I want to see the facts.
> 
> Okay it is based on code from way back (jserv times) that has gradually
> been refined. The original developers (Stefano, Pier and Fede) are all
> fairly smart and know their stuff. You can actually see many of the ideas
> being reflected in industry based standards. ComponentManager stuff is
> basically a stripped down version of using JNDI to compose systems (like
in
> EJB or servlet land), Configuration et al has similar parralels and
context
> is fairly universal through component land.

I think Conor wanted to know which applications already use
Avalon as base framework and how these applications have
undergone tests and/or real world usage.

Wolf


Mime
View raw message