ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Vernum <Tim.Ver...@macquarie.com.au>
Subject RE: Ant2 logging
Date Thu, 10 May 2001 03:13:36 GMT

From: Jon Stevens [mailto:jon@latchkey.com]

> on 5/9/01 7:56 PM, "Tim Vernum" <Tim.Vernum@macquarie.com.au> wrote:

> > Why?
> > Why do you care what toolkit Ant uses to do the logging?
> 
> Simply put:
> 
>     I want choice.

Choice for choice's sake doesn't make much sense to me.
It's just the colour of the bike shed.

If either of the logging kits offers real differences for the end user, then can someone please
post them, but so far I haven't seen a convincing argument on that point from anyone.

If there's no end user difference, then Ant should use the one that simplest for the developer.

> Here is another very good reason:

Of course it is - it was mine :)

> It is such a thin layer that I don't think this is an issue. I already
> posted the code.

But does it do everything that we need?
(Honest question)

Mime
View raw message