ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Les Hughes <leslie.hug...@rubus.com>
Subject RE: [SUBMIT] mimemail task
Date Wed, 02 May 2001 08:29:00 GMT

Steve, 

Looks cool and is just what I needed. I guess just having the java mail and
activation jars instead of j2ee.jar would be OK? (As would weblogic.jar from
6.0sp1 as it contains the mail stuff as well)

Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@iseran.com]
> Sent: 02 May 2001 07:32
> To: ant-dev
> Subject: [SUBMIT] mimemail task
> 
> 
> 
> This is a variant of the mail task (identical syntax) which 
> sends all the
> attached files as mime attachments.
> Kind of handy if your deployment process involves emailing 
> zipped builds.
> 
> It requires j2ee 1.2.1 to build and run, for the javax.mail 
> packages. This
> is where it gets interesting, because the j2ee.jar and 
> jaxp.jar are about as
> compatible on a classpath as protons and antiprotons are in a 
> contained
> space. The particular problem is the sax libraries, jaxp is sealed and
> whines when j2ee adds its own version.
> 
> I can workaround it at build time, but not at run time.
> 
> So the only way I can run this task is to have a version of 
> j2ee.jar with
> all the sax stuff deleted. When you do that the task works 
> fine on windows;
> some unix/mac testing would be nice to verify mime types are 
> consistently
> handled.
> 
> The sealing problem  interesting as if it occurs for other 
> people then it
> represents a symptom of a bigger problem: we can't have j2ee 
> tasks in ant
> because j2ee.jar is incompatible with jaxp. While j2ee 1.3 
> may avoid this by
> incorporating jaxp into its own jar, because that beta isnt 
> compatible with
> java 1.2 or earlier, we cant go that route (yet).
> 
> Maybe I should file this as a bug.
> 
> -steve
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message