ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject Re: Vetoed point??
Date Thu, 10 May 2001 00:10:12 GMT
At 12:13  10/5/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote:
>No, it didn't. I'm still thinking about aspects, but I wouldn't have
>thought that controlling the compiler was a candidate use. Pete, why don't
>you spell out exactly what you mean so that we can understand what are the

Aspects are an implementation strategy and I was told not to discuss them
in requirements phase. Compiler control is not likely to be aspect driven
though - it will probably be part of preferences - whether it is



| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |

View raw message