ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Conor MacNeill" <co...@cognet.com.au>
Subject Re: Vetoed point??
Date Wed, 09 May 2001 14:13:24 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Vernum" <Tim.Vernum@macquarie.com.au>
To: "'ANT-dev'" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: Vetoed point??


> From: Peter Donald [mailto:donaldp@apache.org]
>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------- * It
> > >> should be possible to modify details of the actual build
> > >> (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change
> > the build
> > >> specification.
>
> > I just though it odd as he seemed to be for the notion of
> > aspects which
> > this point was directly related to ;)
>
> Well the point doesn't mention aspects.
> I guess it implied using aspects to you, but it certainly didn't to me.
>

No, it didn't. I'm still thinking about aspects, but I wouldn't have
thought that controlling the compiler was a candidate use. Pete, why don't
you spell out exactly what you mean so that we can understand what are the
implications.

Conor



Mime
View raw message