Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18343 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2001 11:56:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17896 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2001 11:56:21 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: TASTE QUESTION: optional description attribute for ant projects? References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010410220057.00a7fe20@mail.earthlink.net> <00d701c0c27d$de2919f0$d2e3223f@cognetnt> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 11 Apr 2001 13:56:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Conor MacNeill"'s message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:45:36 +1000" Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Conor MacNeill wrote: > From: "Stefan Bodewig" > >> Well, that attribute would become quite large, but I'm +1 on it. > > Wouldn't an element be better then, as Patrick Linskey suggested? Wouldn't it be better for the descriptions of targets and tasks as well? I don't mind too much. > I don't think it would need to be the first element in the > , however. Agreed Stefan