Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-12471-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86583 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2001 13:02:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86557 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 13:02:09 -0000
Message-ID: <6DDA62170439D31185750000F80826AC05B7F613@zmerd004.ca.nortel.com>
From: "Jay Glanville" <dickon@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "Ant-Dev (text)" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [SUBMIT] resubmit of <recorder> with small changes
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:37:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Orig: <dickon@americasm01.nt.com>
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Late?  Man are you late!  ;-)

I also wasn't 100% with the name.  My original intent was to call it <log>,
but I was afraid that people might mistake it as the controls for the
logging functionality provided at the command line.  If we're going to
banter the name around, what's the preference: recorder, record or log?

Jay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@cortexebusiness.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:33 AM
> To: ant-dev
> Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] resubmit of <recorder> with small changes
> 
> 
> Sorry to come to the party late on the <recorder> task. I 
> like it but my
> only minor nit would be to call it <record>. In general I see tasks as
> verbs and datatypes as nouns. Not a big deal, of course :-)
> 
> Conor
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Bodewig" <bodewig@apache.org>
> To: <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] resubmit of <recorder> with small changes
> 
> 
> > Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > cvs 1.10.7 for Linux that is - I now realize, there is a 
> 1.11, I'll
> > > retry.
> >
> > No difference.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> 
>