Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-12366-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39580 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2001 09:36:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39564 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2001 09:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <502326F46B08D41191C400508B6D70C1014B02A3@nvision01.rubus.com>
From: Les Hughes <leslie.hughes@rubus.com>
To: "'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: continuing development for ant 1.4
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:33:06 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N


Hi all,

It was pretty obvious that you guys had other things on your minds recently
but when can we expect to see new 1.x tasks making it into CVS - once all of
the discussion is over maybe? In my case, I'm waiting on a decision on <ear>
and more importantly, Kirk's <p4counter>.

Also, I was wondering will 'old' 1.x tasks will need to be ported to 2.x
sometime in the not to distant future? I'd like to start thinking about
cleaning up the P4 stuff, in particular around the use (or not) of Oro for
regexp matching in p4base but I'd rather wait for the 2.x framework to be a
little firmer before starting if it'll require task re-writes.


Bye,

Les



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Sent: 03 April 2001 07:12
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: continuing development for ant 1.4
> 
> 
> Jay Glanville <dickon@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've noticed something recently.  Around the discussion time for the
> > next release, very little posted patches or submissions actually get
> > submitted into CVS.
> 
> Guess this has to be so as the time most of us can spend on this
> project is limited. But thanks for reminding us that we are
> "commit"ters 8-)
> 
> > For example, I recently submitted a new task (<recorder>) and I want
> > to submit a few minor modifications.
> 
> I've seen you announcing that you'd want to modify your original
> submission and therefore waited for a new one.
> 
> Stefan
>