Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52174 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2001 13:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52164 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2001 13:24:56 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010411232805.00e233c0@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:28:05 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: TASTE QUESTION: optional description attribute for ant projects? In-Reply-To: References: <"Conor MacNeill"'s message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:45:36 +1000"> <5.0.0.25.0.20010410220057.00a7fe20@mail.earthlink.net> <00d701c0c27d$de2919f0$d2e3223f@cognetnt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 01:56 11/4/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> I don't think it would need to be the first element in the >> , however. > >Agreed What about putting it in a comment directly before the relevent element? (Or maybe this could be just for ant2). This works like the javadoc semi-illiterate style and should be familiar to most. (Besides it doesn't require no magic element names but can still contain a chunk of text). Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*