ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <dona...@apache.org>
Subject RE: crimson 1.1
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2001 15:04:04 GMT
At 04:02  3/4/01 +0100, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
>> The name is a little misleading, includeantruntime actually means
>> "include the CLASSPATH environment value".
>> 
>> I usually want my javac tasks to use my CLASSPATH, unless I specify a
>> classpath explicitly that is.
>
>mmm... a little bit dangerous to me because it may have side effects. (ie it
>may compile on your computer but not in the computer of someone else or more
>dangerous: compile differently and the build ends up with a Verify error).
>
>I want it to compile with the build information, not with the information
>available out of the build which may not be the same from one computer to
>another.
>
>I'm working on several modules on different versions (maintenance of course)
>and I think I'm not the only one so it is not very convenient to rely on the
>user classpath. A build is set for the project and that's it. All libs used
>are under source control and only those one should be used otherwise this is
>food for problems :(

100% agree - been to through too many dll/library/jar hells to count and
want ultra build guarentees if at all possible ... however not everyone
feels that way ;)

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*


Mime
View raw message