Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8854 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2001 04:34:08 -0000 Received: from ms0.nttdata.co.jp (HELO ms.nttdata.co.jp) (163.135.193.231) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 8 Mar 2001 04:34:08 -0000 Received: from mail1.nttdata.co.jp ([163.135.10.20]) by ms.nttdata.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-NTTDATA-TOP-03/01/01) with ESMTP id NAA04716 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:34:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from geb.rd.nttdata.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.nttdata.co.jp (8.9.1/3.7W-NTTDmx/00122716) with ESMTP id NAA05956 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:32:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from osiris.rd.nttdata.co.jp (osiris.rd.nttdata.co.jp [10.8.144.16]) by geb.rd.nttdata.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W/R8V8) with ESMTP id NAA28286 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:33:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from piccolo.local (piccolo.rd.nttdata.co.jp [10.8.129.83]) by osiris.rd.nttdata.co.jp (8.10.1/3.7W/R8V8) with ESMTP id f284XvY17627 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:33:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:36:13 +0900 Message-ID: <87vgpk98si.wl@piccolo> From: Takashi Okamoto To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Rmic.java for Kaffe In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:27:37 +1100" References: <87wva17y5v.wl@piccolo> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.15 (More Than Words) EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (AOI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.9 - "Euglena tripteris") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:27:37 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > > From: Takashi Okamoto [mailto:toraneko@kun.ne.jp] > > > > Please refer following patch and fix it (but I didn't test it). > > > > Why didn't you test it? Of courcs, I should test it. However I don't use rmi ( but I think it's problem ) and I don't have sample. If anyone give me sample for rmic, I would test it. > Perhaps rather than just trying every rmic that you can currently think of, > you should look at the approach of javac where compilers can be plugged in. > That way, someone could add the weblogic rmic in the future. I suggest that > rather than using a magic property such as ${build.compiler}, you might make > it an attribute of the task. I think so too. It's perfect solution:) But it takes more time for me, and I didn't so. Maybe that is your (Ant developers) task. I don't know so much about Ant. BTW, Kaffe's guy fixed ZipOutputStream problem soon. -------------------- Takashi Okamoto