Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-11832-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61985 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2001 15:06:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61975 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 15:06:47 -0000
From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <j_a_fernandez@yahoo.com>
To: <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] task/documentation writer's business
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:10:13 -0000
Message-ID: <013101c0b2e2$32b88380$ef69883e@viquity.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-Reply-To: <m3snk5ua6w.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> 
> 
> Jose Alberto Fernandez <j_a_fernandez@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Now, can someone explain to me how come <apply> and <execon> are OK
> > but <javaon> and <anton> are not?
> 
> Nothing's wrong with them - my "we may need to revisit" applies to
> <apply> and <execon> as well.
> 
> People have suggested to put all set logic into the core, so that
> every task that can handle Foo will automatically handle FooSet as
> well - I'm not convinced that this will work BTW. In such a situation
> <apply> would become obsolete and we wouldn't need <javaon>.
> 
> Clearer?
> 

Yes, thanks. That would really be a good step forward.

Jose Alberto

> Stefan
>