ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jon Stevens <...@latchkey.com>
Subject Re: Ant Article
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2001 01:31:41 GMT
on 3/6/01 5:11 PM, "Steve Loughran" <steve_l@iseran.com> wrote:

>> Not a flame, but it is feedback:
>> 
>> I wouldn't call it an "article", I would call it a "weird rant" that isn't
>> very well written (or even spell checked: summarize [sic]).
> 
> Jon, it meets my *internationalised* spelling vocabulary just fine. with an
> australian origin it would pass the local spell checker too. It should be
> proofread a couple of times more though.

See my correction email.

> As to the comments, well, they opinions and it is hard to call them invalid.

Eh? I didn't call the opinions invalid nor did anyone else here.

> But I do use it for C# dev and perl/web site deployment, so the claim of
> being 'java only' isnt true. Its only extensible in Java, but deployment
> problems are deployment problems, regardless of language.

Yup.

-jon


Mime
View raw message