Return-Path: <bodewig@apache.org>
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60813 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2001 10:27:46 -0000
Received: from bodewig.bost.de (root@195.227.98.11)
  by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 10:27:46 -0000
Received: (from bodewig@localhost)
	by bodewig.bost.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA20377;
	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:27:53 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: -emacs flag ??
References: <Peter Donald's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:00:54 +1100">
	<3.0.6.32.20010223163819.0090add0@alphalink.com.au>
	<3.0.6.32.20010223170054.008b7b10@alphalink.com.au>
	<3.0.6.32.20010228200404.00867800@alphalink.com.au>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: 28 Feb 2001 11:27:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: Peter Donald's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:04:04 +1100"
Message-ID: <m3r90j85li.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Peter Donald <donaldp@apache.org> wrote:

> At 09:47  28/2/01 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>Peter Donald <donaldp@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> At 04:42  23/2/01 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote:
>>>>why?
>>> 
>>> why not? ;)
>>
>>Because doing so would imply our default action is wrong? 
> 
> I think it is ;)

Should we make a strawpoll on ant-users to determine what the CLI
frontend for Ant 2 is supposed to generate?

Stefan