Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 59866 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2001 21:41:42 -0000 Received: from lafontaine.cybercable.fr (212.198.0.202) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2001 21:41:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 47142192 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2001 21:41:45 -0000 Received: from r111m80.cybercable.tm.fr (HELO unknowncomp) ([195.132.111.80]) (envelope-sender ) by lafontaine.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Feb 2001 21:41:45 -0000 Message-ID: <030a01c099f4$176b93d0$506f84c3@unknowncomp> From: "Stephane Bailliez" To: References: Subject: Re: Automated execution of run-tests via gump Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:45:20 +0100 Organization: Home MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Ruby" > java.vm.info=mixed mode > java.vm.name=Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM > java.vm.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. > java.vm.version=1.3.0 > os.arch=i386 > os.name=Linux Don't have a working linux boot right now to test this. As of now, if you have time I think it will be worth trying to change the method getProcess of the testcase and add the classic flag to the command, that is: String[] cmdArray = { "java", "-classic" "-classpath", TEST_CLASSPATH, TimeProcess.class.getName(), String.valueOf(timetorun) }; The JVM should start much faster, so maybe it will be enough to boost the process start. At least it should not slow things down. > > IMHO we need at least the following properties: > > - java.vm.info > > - java.vm.name > > - java.vm.vendor > > - java.vm.version > > - os.arch > > - os.name > > - os.version > > - file.encoding > > - user.language > > Added to Ant, starting with tonight's run. Wow, Sam, you're damn reactive :) However, We should pay attention to this, since the JVM info are not necessarily the JVM info used to run the testcases (depends if fork is enabled or not and if your java exe in your path match the one used to run ant via JAVA_HOME.) Windows users often have some nice surprises since the JRE exes are copied into system32 and that this is the first in the path. Personnally, i'm wiping out these exe to avoid confusion. This is also why these info should definitely be part of the testcase reports in order to be sure how tests were run. Stephane