Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95683 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2001 23:52:24 -0000 Received: from mail.alphalink.com.au (203.24.205.7) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 23:52:24 -0000 Received: from donalgar (d128-ps0-mel.alphalink.com.au [202.161.104.128]) by mail.alphalink.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA13303; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:52:27 +1100 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010130103049.00affa70@alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:30:49 +1100 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: onFailure Cc: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3A75AE16.C0290730@metamata.com> References: <3.0.6.32.20010129231542.009aac20@alphalink.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:53 29/1/01 -0800, Louis Tribble wrote: >It's not without precedent. For example, VetoablePropertyChangeListener >can throw a VetoException which requires that object firing the event >change its behavior. Parts of SAX (ErrorListener or whatever it is called) also allow you to rethrow errors/exceptions/etc Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*