ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Cook" <jimc...@iname.com>
Subject Re: Functional Requirements Document
Date Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:56:29 GMT
Jon, I think you should re-read what constitutes a functional requirements
document. What James is writing is certainly *not* such a beast. It is simply
documenting how his proposal works. Closer to a design document.

James has already stated that he doesn't want to waste time with a requirements
document.

jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Stevens" <jon@latchkey.com>
To: <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Functional Requirements Document


> on 1/15/01 1:52 PM, "Siberski, Wolf" <Wolf.Siberski@tui.de> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if writing such a document
> > is really the right approach, but
> > it can't hurt to try it...
> >
> > Wolf
>
> It is actually the perfect approach. Thanks for doing it. Have you seen
> James Davidson's start on such a document? Maybe you can work with him on
> improving his document.
>
> -jon
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


Mime
View raw message