ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Barrie Treloar <Barrie.Trel...@camtech.com.au>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:32:34 GMT
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mariusz Nowostawski wrote:

> But should those "interfaces" being kept in ANT core, or should they be
> kept in seperate, optional tasks repository? For javac, it should be kept
[del]
 
> I prefer a central repository and "unification factory" for optional
> tasks, which could take care of defining those "interfaces", and which
> could keep track of all the optional tasks. The only exception would be
> javac being part of the core.

I think you will find that most people would say that "javac" is not
part of core.  

The way core has been described, IIRC,
        Project,
        Task,
        Target,
        Property.

Barrie
--
Barrie Treloar
____________________________________________________________________

  Barrie Treloar                      Phone: +61 8 8303 3300
  Senior Analyst/Programmer           Fax:   +61 8 8303 4403 
  Electronic Commerce Division        Email: barrie@camtech.com.au
  Camtech (SA) Pty Ltd                http://www.camtech.com.au
 --- Level 8, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia. ---
____________________________________________________________________



Mime
View raw message