ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Conor MacNeill" <co...@ebinteractive.com.au>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:49:59 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:donaldp@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 11 December 2000 12:34
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Cc: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
>
>
> At 12:02  11/12/00 +1030, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> >On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mariusz Nowostawski wrote:
> >
> >> But should those "interfaces" being kept in ANT core, or should they be
> >> kept in seperate, optional tasks repository? For javac, it
> should be kept
> >[del]
> >
> >> I prefer a central repository and "unification factory" for optional
> >> tasks, which could take care of defining those "interfaces", and which
> >> could keep track of all the optional tasks. The only exception would be
> >> javac being part of the core.
> >
> >I think you will find that most people would say that "javac" is not
> >part of core.
> >
> >The way core has been described, IIRC,
> >        Project,
> >        Task,
> >        Target,
> >        Property.
>
> Or alternatively ;)
>
> Core= Project + Target + task
> Core Tasks= Property + Taskdef
>

How about:

Core Tasks = all tasks ant needs to build itself.

Conor


Mime
View raw message