ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephane Bailliez <>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:24:50 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill []
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 2:02 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
> Another candidate is the <javac> task itself. The current 
> mess of supporting
> many compiler variations is not really nice. I would like to 
> see a mechanism
> where different compilers could be plugged in. In fact such a 
> system would
> allow the Jikes implementation to be moved out of the core 
> and into the
> Jikes project.

Agreed. This is exactly the problem I ran into this week end. I was trying
to plug the mjavac compiler from Metamata that add a couple of things to the
bytecode for coverage or debug purposes, but the current implementation
somewhat blocked me.
I faced two choices:
- copy/paste the vast majority of the code to my own implementation. :-(
- add another doMJavacCompile and doMJikesCompile to the Javac :-(

In any case not a good I did nothing yet, 'im still unsure about
the best way to do it right now.

The only thing that change for mjavac and mjikes is the addition of another
option "-cover", it was thus an ideal candidate for inheritance.

 St├ęphane Bailliez 
 Software Engineer, Paris - France 
 iMediation - 
 Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and not those from my

View raw message