ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject Re: AntEater
Date Mon, 18 Dec 2000 05:05:06 GMT
At 09:05  17/12/00 -0800, James Duncan Davidson wrote:
>> 1. a stable Project-Target-Task object hierarchy (although these should
>> be defined interfaces, not classes).
>There's enough functionality that can be implemented in Project, Target, and
>Task to merit them being classes. And, since it's not expected that there
>will be multiple differing implementations of Project, Target, and Task

Theres been requests for it. Quite a few - mainly with respect for adding
extra gee-whiz functionality that should NOT be in core but would be useful
for integration into GUIs/IDEs. Like keeping comments and raising property
change/veto events etc.



| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |

View raw message