ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <dona...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Optional Tasks
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2000 01:33:36 GMT
At 12:02  11/12/00 +1030, Barrie Treloar wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Mariusz Nowostawski wrote:
>
>> But should those "interfaces" being kept in ANT core, or should they be
>> kept in seperate, optional tasks repository? For javac, it should be kept
>[del]
> 
>> I prefer a central repository and "unification factory" for optional
>> tasks, which could take care of defining those "interfaces", and which
>> could keep track of all the optional tasks. The only exception would be
>> javac being part of the core.
>
>I think you will find that most people would say that "javac" is not
>part of core.  
>
>The way core has been described, IIRC,
>        Project,
>        Task,
>        Target,
>        Property.

Or alternatively ;)

Core= Project + Target + task
Core Tasks= Property + Taskdef

Cheers,

Pete

*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |
*-----------------------------------------------------*


Mime
View raw message