ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject Re: Ant 2 -> Java 1.2
Date Sat, 09 Dec 2000 22:27:47 GMT
At 03:27  9/12/00 -0500, Chris Todd wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jon Stevens []
>>Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 3:06 PM
>>Subject: Re: cvs
>>4) For the people who are still confused and just don't get it, this is the
>>*build environment* that would have the JDK 1.2 requirement. It doesn't
>>matter if your code execution still has a JDK 1.1 requirement because you
>>can still use Ant to compile your 1.1 code.
>I wasn't confused, and I don't think too many people were.  Being able to
>build 1.1 code using an Ant that itself only runs in a 1.2 VM doesn't matter
>to folks who develop and build their code on systems for which JDK1.2 is

What environment would that be? I don't know of any environment that
doesn't have reasonable 1.2 support. Hell - excepting *BSD, I don't know of
any developers environment that has a 1.2 but doesn't have a reasonable 1.3.

>You would essentially be telling those folks they can't use
>Ant in their development environment, they will have to go find some other
>system that has a 1.2 VM available for doing their builds.  

nope - you will always have ant 1.*

>I don't know how
>many systems only have 1.1 VMs available, but I would rather see Ant be
>inclusive rather than exclusive.  Just my 2 cents as a devoted Ant user.

inclusive is good ... when it is not limiting. If I had to choose between
keeping 100% of current user base or developing a better product (and thus
more likely gain more more users) you know which choice I would make ? ;P
If you *reall* want 1.1 then you always have 1.*



| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof."                   |
|              - John Kenneth Galbraith               |

View raw message