ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject RE: Searching for build.xml
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2000 23:18:01 GMT
I think that a -find or -search flag would suffice.  Granted, that users
could just write a wrapper script around Ant, but this searching mode is
quite common, and it would be a shame to have all of that duplicate code
everywhere.

--jason


On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Jose  Alberto Fernandez wrote:

> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@bost.de]
> > 
> > As I've been the one who committed the code in the first place, I feel
> > a bit responsible for it.
> > 
> > As for JDE I'm still hoping to get the submission of Jason and Jose
> > Alberto merged to form a jde-ant.el that we can distribute with Ant
> > and plug into JDE's project management stuff.
> > 
> 
> On this regard, I guess part of the problem was that I looked at Jason's
> code and mine ad they where so different I wasn't sure how to mix them.
> And I was not ready to give up on mine ;-0
> 
> I will try to follow up with Jason on defining some objectives so that
> we converge to something we both think is powerful enough for most users.
> 
> > >>>>> "JAF" == Jose Alberto Fernandez <JFernandez@viquity.com>
writes:
> > 
> >  JAF> I agree 100% with changing this to be an optional feature and
> >  JAF> maybe make it more powerful:
> > 
> >  JAF>   ant -find utl/config/build.xml
> > 
> > There seems to be consensus on either removing the feature altogether
> > or making it optional. I like Jose Alberto's version best so I'm going
> > to change Ant to follow his proposal unless there are objections.
> > 
> > This means Ant 1.3 would break older build environments in this case,
> > what are we going to do about this?
> > 
> 
> Notice I would still live "ant" to be the same as "ant -f build.xml".
> So that we only break very new environments.
> 
> Jose Alberto
> 


Mime
View raw message