Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 73539 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2000 00:02:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.cortexebusiness.com.au) (203.174.140.214) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2000 00:02:40 -0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp.cortexebusiness.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e9U02Zj02224 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:02:35 +1100 (EST) Received: from UNKNOWN(192.168.1.8), claiming to be "monkey.prod.thespot.com.au" via SMTP by ripley, id smtpdAAAV4aqte; Mon Oct 30 11:01:09 2000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by monkey.prod.thespot.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e9U018q24072 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:01:08 +1100 (EST) Received: from UNKNOWN(192.168.1.9), claiming to be "chunky.devl.ebinteractive.com.au" via SMTP by monkey, id smtpdAAAvvayaV; Mon Oct 30 11:01:06 2000 Received: from snotty (snotty.devl.ebinteractive.com.au [192.168.1.32]) by chunky.devl.ebinteractive.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id e9U016B15645 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:01:06 +1100 (EST) From: "Conor MacNeill" To: Subject: RE: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:02:08 +1100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-reply-to: <000201c040f2$85908c40$80dc1fcb@cognet.com.au> X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Forgot one of my favourites. I have in the past proposed supporting the multithreading of tasks within a target by the addition of a boolean async attribute. I think this is a valuable feature for running test harnesses on servers, without the need to start multiple ants. I have used this with JUnit tests on a Weblogic EJB server. Thomas Christen has asked about having parallel targets within a project. I don't really support that as I think it is significantly more complex than multithreading tasks within a target. Nevertheless I think we should examine both ideas as part of this process to see if either of them has merit in a future ant. -- Conor MacNeill conor@cortexebusiness.com.au Cortex eBusiness http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@m64.com] > Sent: Sunday, 29 October 2000 2:20 > To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: RE: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0 > > > Stefan, > > I would include on the list of items for discussion, the removal of > implicit filtering. I think explicit filtering such as > > > > > > is much clearer (remove the filtering attribute). A potential > build-breaker, of course. > > Conor > > > > > >