ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jose Alberto Fernandez <JFernan...@viquity.com>
Subject RE: Missing feature?
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2000 18:36:47 GMT
> From: Roberto Lo Giacco [mailto:rlogiacco@mail.com]
> 
> > >>>>> "PD" == Peter Donald <donaldp@mad.scientist.com> writes:
> >
> >  PD> this is now done through the ant-call task that is 
> unfortunately
> >  PD> yet to be documented
> >
> > But does the same as <ant> called on the same file - at least at the
> > moment.
> >
> > BTW It has been suggested to call the task calltarget instead of
> > antcall, any objections?
> 
> Can I propose simply, silly and stupdly <call 
> target="myTarget"/> or <goto
> target="myTarget"/> ?
> 

<call> is fine with me.
<goto> is definitely WRONG. We are not doing an unstructure GOTO,
we are doing a recursive call (push and pop on a stack).
Additionally, you can pass parameters to be used by the called target.

Jose Alberto

Mime
View raw message