Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52916 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2000 13:57:28 -0000 Received: from ha1.rdc1.tn.home.com (HELO mail.rdc1.tn.home.com) (imail@24.2.7.66) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2000 13:57:28 -0000 Received: from hermes ([24.4.119.170]) by mail.rdc1.tn.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP id <20000726135727.TGAG25440.mail.rdc1.tn.home.com@hermes> for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 06:57:27 -0700 From: "Paul Philion" To: Subject: RE: Some thoughts about runtime evaluation of properties Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:58:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefan - That's a reasonable way to do it (and easy to implement), unless someone wants to implement something like: ... Note: I'm not suggesting that that is something that should be supported, or that it is something anyone would ever use. I'm just trying to point out potential issues. My goal is to make ant build files as simple as possible, both the write and understand. Immutable properties are very attractive (for their simplicity) but they do produce problems. - Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@bost.de] > > This would also mean > > > > had a fixed value, constructed from the value build.dir had > when this > task (if you want to call a task) was executed.