ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tim Fennell" <tfe...@rcn.com>
Subject Optional EJB tasks (was RE: Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional)
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2000 10:48:17 GMT
On the topic of EJB tasks, has anyone written anything for EJB1.1 and/or
Weblogic 5.1?

If not, then I'd like to offer up what I have. I hava an EJB task that
inherits from directory scanner, scans for deployment descriptors and
assembles the EJB1.1 jars from the contents of the descriptor (XML only, not
the 1.0 serialized classes), then optionally calls weblogic's ejbc. Works
very well for me, and now I can have only one task for all of my EJBs. It
should also be really easy to extend to call other vendors' compilers.

Is there any interest? If so then I'll post the code here (I assume this is
the right forum?).

-t

-----Original Message-----
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@m64.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 05:14
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional (was: RE: [PATCH]:
Path, Execution framework, JUnit and JavaCC)


> From: Siberski, Wolf [mailto:Wolf.Siberski@tui.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 July 2000 18:19
> To: 'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional (was: RE: [PATCH]: Path,
> Execution framework, JUnit and JavaCC)
>
>
> That wouldn't help because we would get as many subpackages
> as we have optional tasks now; what would we gain by introducing
> subpackages then?.
> As I'm no ant developer I'm reluctant to make a complete proposal
> here. But IMHO the tasks should be put in more general packages.
> E.g. I would put all EJB related tasks in a .ejb package, all
> version control tasks in a .sccm package, etc.
> If this is not enough, one could add subpackages for the
> different products, e.g. .ejb.wls, .ejb.inprise, .sccm.cvs,
> .sccm.pvcs, ...
>

+1

I had reached a similar conclusion and I am intending to add my weblogic
tasks under optional.ejb



Mime
View raw message