ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siberski, Wolf" <Wolf.Siber...@tui.de>
Subject Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional (was: RE: [PATCH]: Path, Exec ution framework, JUnit and JavaCC)
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2000 08:18:58 GMT
> From: Thomas Haas [mailto:thomas.haas@softwired-inc.com]
> conor@m64.com (Conor MacNeill) wrote:
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Haas [mailto:thomas.haas@softwired-inc.com]
[snip]
> > >
> > > I would love to add subpackages to
> > >
> > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional
> > >
> > 
> > Can we work out a simple standard for this area then?
> 
> how about the package being equal to the name of the task.
> 
That wouldn't help because we would get as many subpackages
as we have optional tasks now; what would we gain by introducing
subpackages then?.
As I'm no ant developer I'm reluctant to make a complete proposal
here. But IMHO the tasks should be put in more general packages.
E.g. I would put all EJB related tasks in a .ejb package, all
version control tasks in a .sccm package, etc.
If this is not enough, one could add subpackages for the
different products, e.g. .ejb.wls, .ejb.inprise, .sccm.cvs,
.sccm.pvcs, ...

Wolf

Mime
View raw message