ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jimmy Sieben <jim...@utdallas.edu>
Subject Re: cvs task - BufferedReader code in Exec.java
Date Sat, 15 Jul 2000 03:31:48 GMT
At 09:00 PM 7/14/2000, you wrote:

>That's one interpretation.  The license is painfully unclear in this
>regard, and there's no precedent from any court case to back up any
>interpretation.  You'd have to convince a judge that making hard-coded
>reflection calls was somehow fundamentally different than making direct
>calls.  In my opinion the LGPL isn't appropriate for Java.  The MPL has
>a similar effect with stronger legal protection to the library user.
>
>-jh-

Slightly off-topic,
         But if I were to write a Java library, and I wanted to ensure that 
mods to the library must be distributed, but that any application that 
makes use of it (through dynamic or static linking) would not, which 
license would I want to use?
         This issue is going to come up for me pretty soon, and playing 
license bingo is very frustrating. Is there a comprehensive resource for 
this stuff (and relevant to Java, especially) out there that someone could 
point me to?
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
| Jimmy Sieben <> jimmys@utdallas.edu <> EvlG@IRC <> Young Game Designer
|
| ICQ UIN: 650255 <> Most things suck, thats what makes some things rock |
| Homepage: http://www.utdallas.edu/~jimmys/                             |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+


Mime
View raw message