ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Winkley, Dennis x66244" <DWink...@bis.adp.com>
Subject RE: no response?? RE: building . . .
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:12:04 GMT
the problem I would have with that is it produces the same affect as doing a
build all which is what I am trying to avoid.  (this means you have to be a
lot more careful with dependencies but would save me a lot of time).

Dennis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpfoemme@ThoughtWorks.com [mailto:mpfoemme@ThoughtWorks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 10:47 AM
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: no response?? RE: building . . .
> 
> 
> 
> On our project, we've configured our SCM tool (starteam) to set the
> timestamps of checked out files to the current time, instead 
> of the time of
> the last checkin. This is the equivalent of touching each 
> file after it
> gets checked out, and causes them to be rebuilt...
> 
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                      
>                     "Winkley,                                 
>                                                      
>                     Dennis               To:     
> "'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>       
>                     x66244"              cc:                  
>                                                      
>                     <DWinkley@bis        Subject:     no 
> response?? RE: building . . .                             
>                     .adp.com>                                 
>                                                      
>                                                               
>                                                      
>                     07/12/2000                                
>                                                      
>                     11:39 AM                                  
>                                                      
>                     Please                                    
>                                                      
>                     respond to                                
>                                                      
>                     ant-dev                                   
>                                                      
>                                                               
>                                                      
>                                                               
>                                                      
> 
> 
> 
> 
> why hasn't anybody said anything about this... I'd appreciate at least
> hearing peoples opinion even if it's negative...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Winkley, Dennis x66244 [mailto:DWinkley@bis.adp.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 2:55 PM
> > To: 'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> > Subject: building only changed files after getting those files from
> > versio n control system
> >
> >
> > I am currently working on a project for which ant has been
> > chosen as the
> > build tool.  I was wondering if anyone had figured out a way
> > to make sure
> > any 'new' files checked out from a version control system are
> > built without
> > completely cleaning the directory.  The issue here is that I
> > may have done a
> > build after the time that a file was checked in (i.e. I do 
> a get every
> > morning and may very well have done a build at say 4:00 the
> > previous day but
> > someone checked in a file at noon on the previous day so the
> > class file date
> > is still later than the source file date).
> >
> > If this hasn't been dealt with, I was wondering if it might
> > be possible to
> > make it so the javac task sets a class files date to match
> > the source file
> > date and then have it compile any file where the dates aren't
> > exact matches.
> > ??
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message