ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carlos Pita" <car...@aper.net>
Subject RE: RV: Nesting Tasks
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:36:22 GMT
Hi,

    I had a feeling about the script Task being some kind of solution to the
problems that originated my proposal (for example jar'ing classes in an
arbitrary list of dirs given, for example, as a -D parameter to ant into a
number of jars, one for each dir). But I couldn't find out anything about
BSF - the ibm site's open source section devoted to BSF has only a web
access to the CVS and a broken become_a_contributor link-. I would thank you
if you could give me some hint on this.
    Anyway, I think some limited scripting support as xml tags wouldn't
harm.
    The core changes are:
    .in ProjectHelper, specificaly in the algorithm that expands variables.
    .in the Task class, I sould add a "enclosingTask" property (r/w).
    The other changes are implemented inside a subclass of Task that nesting
tasks would extend.

Carlos

----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@bost.de>
To: <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: RV: Nesting Tasks


> Hi Carlos,
>
> if nobody has responded yet, this is not due to our ignorance but
> because many of us are quite busy at the moment.
>
> >>>>> "CP" == Carlos Pita <carlos@aper.net> writes:
>
>  CP> I'm waiting my proposal not to be plainly rejected to begin
>  CP> writing it (I don't want to have my own ant branch :( ).
>
> Of course.
>
> OK, let's see. I'm not too fond of a looping construct actually as I
> feel this is putting too much procedural behavior into Ant.
>
> As you are proposing to do it on a task level and not inside the Ant
> core, this might be "tolerable" (tongue in the cheek smiley here), but
> before I take a closer look at what you are proposing, consider
>
> <target name="inside_loop" id="inner">
>   <mkdir id="mkdir1" />
>   <copydir id="copydir1" />
> </target>
>
> <target name="loop" />
>   <script language="JavaScript"><![CDATA[
>      targetDir[0] = "myfirstdir";
>      targetDir[1] = "myseconddir";
>      copydir1.src = "mysourcedir";
>      for (i=0; i<2; i++) {
>          mkdir1.dir = targetDir[i];
>          copydir1.dest = targetDir[i];
>          inner.execute();
>      }
>   ]]></script>
> </target>
>
> This might not be the exact syntax but you get the idea. And something
> like this is already available, at least partly and it will be
> extended.
>
> But now to your proposal.
>
>  CP> 1) nesting Tasks are Tasks (actually subclasses of Task)
>
>  CP> 2) nesting Tasks can be nested by other nesting Tasks
>
> OK, no problem.
>
>  CP> 4) a nesting Task has a list with every enclosed (top-level)
>  CP> Task. (it could, for example, cycle over this list).
>
> Everything nested inside a nesting task would be created by a
> createNameThatTask() method or added to the nesting task via
> addNameThatTask(Task), so it would know about these of course.
>
> I see a mayor problem here, either nesting task would need to know all
> tasks by name (and provide methods to create or add them) - which is
> impossible in the light of taskdefs - or we would need to change the
> Ant core to support this.
>
>  CP> 3) nesting Tasks have a special (xml) property which lists a
>  CP> number of (ant) properties which wouldn't be expanded the normal
>  CP> way in the enclosed tags but instead will be expanded when
>  CP> execute'ing the nesting Task with a special subclass method (see
>  CP> below).
>
> Here you are proposing some heavier changes to the core - currently
> ProjectHelper doesn't care about whose attributes it is working on
> when expanding properties and so on. I'll have to think about the
> consequences before I can comment on it, sorry.
>
> Cheers
>
>         Stefan
>


Mime
View raw message