ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Conor MacNeill" <co...@m64.com>
Subject RE: Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional (was: RE: [PATCH]: Path, Execution framework, JUnit and JavaCC)
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:13:58 GMT
> From: Siberski, Wolf [mailto:Wolf.Siberski@tui.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 July 2000 18:19
> To: 'ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: Subpackages of ...taskdefs.optional (was: RE: [PATCH]: Path,
> Execution framework, JUnit and JavaCC)
>
>
> That wouldn't help because we would get as many subpackages
> as we have optional tasks now; what would we gain by introducing
> subpackages then?.
> As I'm no ant developer I'm reluctant to make a complete proposal
> here. But IMHO the tasks should be put in more general packages.
> E.g. I would put all EJB related tasks in a .ejb package, all
> version control tasks in a .sccm package, etc.
> If this is not enough, one could add subpackages for the
> different products, e.g. .ejb.wls, .ejb.inprise, .sccm.cvs,
> .sccm.pvcs, ...
>

+1

I had reached a similar conclusion and I am intending to add my weblogic
tasks under optional.ejb



Mime
View raw message